Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-04-14 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2018-04-14 House Journal Page 3283 HB 336 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 336 "An Act relating to supported decision-making agreements to provide for decision-making assistance; and amending Rule 402, Alaska Rules of Evidence." with the: Journal Page HSS RPT CS(HSS) 6DP 2649 FN1: (DHS) 2650 JUD RPT CS(JUD) 4DP 2NR 1AM 3185 FN2: ZERO(DHS) 3186 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 336(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Millett: Page 12, line 29, through page 13, line 5: Delete all material. Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2018-04-14 House Journal Page 3284 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 336(JUD) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There was objection. The question being: "Shall CSHB 336(JUD) am advance to third reading on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 336(JUD) am Second Reading Advance to Third Reading on the Same Day YEAS: 39 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman And so, the motion passed. CSHB 336(JUD) am was read the third time. Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 336(JUD) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 2. There was objection. The question being: "Shall CSHB 336(JUD) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 2?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 336(JUD) am Third Reading Return to Second for Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 2018-04-14 House Journal Page 3285 Yeas: Eastman, Neuman, Rauscher, Reinbold, Talerico, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Lincoln, Millett, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Saddler, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Absent: Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Seaton And so, the motion failed. Representative Saddler moved and asked unanimous consent to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and he was required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSHB 336(JUD) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 336(JUD) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 39 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman And so, CSHB 336(JUD) am passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 336(JUD) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.